Classification of ECG Signal Using Deep Convolutional Neural


  • University of Thi-Qar1,2, College of Education for pure Sciences, Iraq.
  • University of Thi-Qar1,2, College of Education for pure Sciences, Iraq.
  • University of Thi-Qar1,2, College of Education for pure Sciences, Iraq.


Electrocardiogram (ECG),, Deep learning, , convolutional neural network (CNN).


In the last ten years, the characterization and expectation of cardiac illnesses based on ECG signals have become increasingly important for doctors and patients. This paper delivers a deep learning technique that has recently been created for the order of ECG information with Normal Sinus Rhythm (NSR), Abnormal Arrhythmia (ARR), and Congestive Heart Failure (CHF). A sum of 162 ECG signals is open, including 96 arrhythmias, 30 Congestive Heart failures, and 36 Normal Sinus Rhythm signals. To exhibit the classification performance of deep learning architectures, this paper studied ECG using the two CNN models GoogleNet and DenseNet201. The proposed study's classification accuracy is 91% and 100% respectively. The outcomes uncover that the proposed profound learning architecture is more precise than traditional machine learning classifiers at classifying ECG signals.


K. Ye, “Inter-patient electrocardiogram heartbeat classification with 2-D convolutional neural network.” 2021.

L. A. Abdullah and M. S. Al-Ani, “CNN-LSTM based model for ECG arrhythmias and myocardial infarction classification,” Adv. Sci. Technol. Eng. Syst., vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 601–606, 2020, doi: 10.25046/AJ050573.

A. Su, “ECG Noise Filtering Using Online Model-Based Bayesian Filtering Techniques.”

A. Sheetal, H. Singh, and A. Kaur, “QRS detection of ECG signal using hybrid derivative and MaMeMi filter by effectively eliminating the baseline wander,” Analog Integr. Circuits Signal Process., vol. 98, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2019, doi: 10.1007/s10470-018-1249-7.


N. Ammour, H. Alhichri, Y. Bazi, and N. Alajlan, “LwF-ECG: Learning-without-forgetting approach for electrocardiogram heartbeat classification based on memory with task selector,” Comput. Biol. Med., vol. 137, p. 104807, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104807.

N. A. Muhammad, A. A. Nasir, Z. Ibrahim, and N. Sabri, “Evaluation of CNN, alexnet and GoogleNet for fruit recognition,” Indones. J. Electr. Eng. Comput. Sci., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 468–475, 2018, doi: 10.11591/ijeecs.v12.i2.pp468-475.

N. Alsharman and I. Jawarneh, “GoogleNet CNN neural network towards chest

CT-coronavirus medical image classification,” J. Comput. Sci., vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 620–625, 2020, doi: 10.3844/JCSSP.2020.620.625.

J. A. Gliner, G. A. Morgan, N. L. Leech, J. A. Gliner, and G. A. Morgan, “Measurement Reliability and Validity,” Res. Methods Appl. Settings, pp. 319–338, 2021, doi: 10.4324/9781410605337-29.

M. Z. Alom et al., “The History Began from AlexNet: A Comprehensive Survey on Deep Learning Approaches,” 2018, [Online]. Available:

P. Singh and A. Manure, “Introduction to tensorflow 2.0,” in Learn TensorFlow 2.0, Springer, 2020, pp. 1–24.

G. Huang, Z. Liu, L. Van Der Maaten, and K. Q. Weinberger, “Densely connected convolutional networks,” Proc. - 30th IEEE Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognition, CVPR 2017, vol. 2017-Janua, pp. 2261–2269, 2017, doi: 10.1109/CVPR..2017.243.