Peer Review

 

The Journal of Education for Pure Science (JEPS) follows a rigorous double-blind peer review process to ensure the quality and integrity of published research.

Review Procedure

  1. Submission
    The author submits the manuscript through the journal system.

  2. Initial Screening
    The editorial office checks the manuscript for formatting, scope, and plagiarism.

  3. Editor Evaluation
    The Editor-in-Chief evaluates the manuscript for originality and relevance.

  4. Reviewer Assignment
    The manuscript is sent to at least two independent reviewers.

  5. Review Process
    Reviewers evaluate the manuscript based on:

    • Originality

    • Methodology

    • Clarity

    • Contribution to the field

  6. Decision
    Based on reviewers’ comments, the editor makes one of the following decisions:

    • Accept

    • Minor Revision

    • Major Revision

    • Reject

  7. Revision
    Authors revise the manuscript according to reviewers’ comments.

  8. Final Decision
    The editor makes the final decision on publication.

Review Type

JEPS uses a double-blind peer review system, where both authors and reviewers remain anonymous.

Purpose of Peer Review

Peer review ensures that published research is:

  • Scientifically valid

  • Clearly presented

  • Relevant to the field

  • High quality